Trump Wants Denmark and Greenland, Even with Military
Explore the latest on Trump’s interest in integrating Denmark and Greenland with a strategic military perspective. Read the full details now.
Click to summarize this article.
Denmark and Greenland are asking for talks with Secretary of State Marco Rubio. This comes as President Donald Trump’s team continues to push for control of the Arctic. They see Greenland as key to U.S. defense, even though it’s part of Denmark.
Greenland is its own government but is tied to Denmark through NATO. This has sparked a big debate about borders and security in the Arctic.
Trump believes the U.S. needs to control Greenland more because of China and Russia’s growing presence. The White House’s statement about using the military has worried many countries.
Read the latest on Denmark and the efforts to keep the Arctic stable.
Denmark and Greenland Key Takeaways
- Denmark and Greenland want a meeting with Marco Rubio amid growing debate over the takeover.
- Greenland is a self-governing territory of Denmark within the Kingdom of Denmark.
- The Kingdom of Denmark ties Greenland to NATO’s security framework in the Arctic region.
- Trump links Greenland to U.S. defense as China and Russia step up Arctic activity.
- The White House said the U.S. military is always an option, a move that alarmed allies.
- The dispute is testing how Denmark and Greenland fit into NATO unity in the Arctic region.
Denmark and Greenland seek a meeting with Marco Rubio as Trump doubles down on takeover talk
Diplomats in Washington and Nuuk are trying to calm tensions over Greenland. This is one of the most strategic Danish territories. The outreach comes at a tense time for Scandinavian countries and other Nordic countries.
The renewed push shows a wider concern. Talk of ownership can affect identity and daily life, including Danish culture. For readers keeping up with the latest, this PBS NewsHour report explains the situation this week.
Request for a Rubio sit-down after earlier attempts failed
Danish Foreign Minister Lars Løkke Rasmussen and Greenland’s foreign affairs representative Vivian Motzfeldt asked for a meeting with Secretary of State Marco Rubio “in the near future.” This was stated on Greenland’s government website. They mentioned that earlier requests to meet were unsuccessful, so this is a restart.
What prompted the outreach: the White House’s statement that the “U.S. military is always an option.”
Urgency increased after the White House said the “U.S. military is always an option” regarding Greenland. This raised alarms in Northern Europe. Leaders there often see security promises as tied to respect for Danish territories and local self-rule.
How the story emerged: Rubio’s classified briefing to lawmakers was reported by The Wall Street Journal
The deeper details emerged after Rubio briefed lawmakers in a classified session on Capitol Hill, as first reported by The Wall Street Journal. A person with knowledge of the private discussion described Rubio as saying the administration aims to eventually purchase Greenland rather than use military force.
On the same day, Rubio briefed the full Senate and House. Questions ranged beyond the Arctic. Lawmakers also pressed him on the administration’s operation aimed at capturing Nicolás Maduro, showing how foreign policy debates can collide in one room.
Rubio’s public comments: Trump has talked about acquiring Greenland for years
In public remarks on Wednesday, Rubio told reporters that Trump has long discussed acquiring Greenland. This comment was seen across Scandinavian countries and other Nordic countries. It reminded them that Arctic interest is not new, even as the stakes feel sharper now.
For Greenland and Denmark, the message is different. It touches sovereignty, defense ties, and the cultural fabric that shapes Danish culture at home and across the North Atlantic. In Northern Europe, officials are watching closely for whether the next step is dialogue or more pressure on Danish territories.
Why the Trump administration says Greenland matters to U.S. security in the Arctic region
In Washington, the debate is about geography and timing. Greenland is a key link in Arctic air and sea lanes. It’s tied to Denmark, linking defense and diplomacy.
Trump’s argument: controlling the world’s largest island amid rising China and Russia threats
President Trump sees Greenland as a strategic link between North America and Northern Europe. He believes its value increases as China’s and Russia’s interests grow. The White House sees buying Greenland as a national security goal, as reported in recent news.
Rubio’s message to lawmakers: preference for eventual purchase over military force
Marco Rubio prefers buying Greenland over using force, sources say. Yet, officials say military options are on the table. This choice is a key point of contention for Denmark and Greenland.
Thomas Crosbie, a professor at the Royal Danish Defense College, doubts the security benefits of taking Greenland. He says the U.S. already gets what it needs from Denmark. He also fears annexation could undermine the rule of law.
NATO and Northern Europe fallout: Danish PM Mette Frederiksen warns a takeover could end NATO
The Pentagon’s presence in Greenland shapes what’s possible. The U.S. has a space base there, but Crosbie doubts a fight with Denmark is imminent. Yet, the shockwaves would hit NATO hard in Northern Europe.
Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen says a U.S. takeover would end NATO. Maria Martisiute of the European Policy Centre says Nordic governments don’t make such statements lightly. Denmark has also expanded defense cooperation, including a 2023 deal with the U.S.
European allies push back: leaders reaffirm the mineral-rich island “belongs to its people.”
Denmark has set limits. Lars Løkke Rasmussen said Denmark could cancel the basing agreement if the U.S. tries to annex Greenland. Senators Jeanne Shaheen and Thom Tillis also stressed the importance of respecting Denmark’s sovereignty.
European leaders support Denmark and Greenland. France, Germany, Italy, Poland, Spain, and the U.K. agree that any change must come through dialogue. French Foreign Minister Jean-Noël Barrot spoke with Rubio, who dismissed a military takeover. Barrot warned that aggression toward a NATO member could harm U.S. support for the alliance.
Denmark and Greenland Conclusion
The standoff between Denmark and Greenland has become more public. They are asking for a meeting with Marco Rubio again. This comes after earlier attempts failed, and President Donald Trump has brought up the idea of taking over Greenland again.
The White House has also mentioned that the U.S. military could be used. This has made officials in Nordic and Scandinavian countries very worried.
There is a big policy difference at the heart of this issue. Trump believes Greenland is key to U.S. security in the Arctic. He sees threats from China and Russia. On the other hand, Rubio thinks the U.S. should buy Greenland rather than use force.
Diplomacy might be more important than geography in what happens next. Denmark’s leaders are worried that aggressive talk could break NATO. They say Greenland’s future should be decided by its people, not by outsiders.
In Washington, there is criticism from the Senate. This adds to the challenges of using tough tactics. Officials are thinking about how this could affect alliances in Northern Europe and the transatlantic partnership.
For now, Greenland is part of the Danish Realm. Defense is handled together with Denmark. The U.S. has treaty rights for a long presence. This shows why talks are more important than threats, as reported in the latest news on Greenland.
A deeper look at the legal and financial ties between Greenland and Denmark is in the analysis of the U.S.–Denmark defense. This helps explain why this debate is important for more than just Denmark.
Denmark and Greenland FAQ
Why are Denmark and Greenland seeking direct talks with U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio now?
Denmark and Greenland want to meet with Marco Rubio soon. This is because the U.S. doubled down on its desire for Greenland. Tensions with U.S. allies have risen.
Who requested the meeting with Rubio, and where was it announced?
Danish Foreign Minister Lars Løkke Rasmussen and Greenland’s foreign affairs representative, Vivian Motzfeldt, requested the meeting. They made the request public on Greenland’s government website.
What key detail shows this is a renewed diplomatic effort?
The statement noted that earlier requests for a meeting had been unsuccessful. This new push shows Denmark and Greenland are trying again.
What exactly did the White House say that escalated the situation?
The White House said the “U.S. military is always an option.” This statement alarmed partners across the Scandinavian countries and NATO.
How did Rubio’s position reach lawmakers and the public?
Rubio’s stance was shared in a classified briefing on Capitol Hill. It was first reported by The Wall Street Journal. An anonymous source confirmed the details.
What did Rubio say publicly about Trump’s interest?
Rubio told reporters that Trump has discussed buying Greenland for years. This shows the administration’s interest is long-standing, not sudden.
What else did Rubio brief Congress about on the same day?
Rubio briefed the full Senate and House. Questions went beyond Greenland. Lawmakers also asked about the administration’s plans to capture Nicolás Maduro.
What is Greenland’s political status within the Kingdom of Denmark?
Greenland is a self-governing territory of Denmark within the Kingdom of Denmark. It manages many domestic affairs while remaining connected to Denmark on key sovereign matters.
How is Greenland connected to NATO and Western security architecture?
Greenland is tied to NATO through the Kingdom of Denmark, which is a NATO member. This link places Greenland within a broader Western security framework.
Why does the Trump administration say Greenland matters to U.S. security?
Trump believes the U.S. needs control of Greenland to protect American security. He says this is because China and Russia are increasing Arctic activity.
What did Rubio tell lawmakers about the administration’s preferred path—purchase or force?
Rubio said the administration plans to eventually purchase Greenland rather than use military force. But the White House’s “always an option” phrasing has kept allies on edge.
What does Denmark’s expert Thomas Crosbie say about whether a takeover would help U.S. security?
Thomas Crosbie, an associate professor at the Royal Danish Defense College, says an American takeover would not improve Washington’s security. He believes there is no advantage to the U.S. flag flying in Nuuk instead of the Greenlandic flag.
What U.S. military footprint already exists in Greenland?
The U.S. Department of Defense operates Pituffik Space Base in northwestern Greenland. Crosbie noted that personnel already there could, in theory, be mobilized, though he doubted the U.S. would seek to harm locals or fight Danish troops.
What broader risk does Crosbie warn annexation could create beyond military conflict?
Crosbie warns that annexation could erode the rule of law globally. He says it would show that international norms do not protect smaller actors.
How has Denmark expanded defense cooperation with the United States in recent years?
Denmark’s parliament approved a bill last June allowing U.S. military bases on Danish soil. This move shows deep U.S.-Denmark ties in the Nordic countries.
What safeguard did Lars Løkke Rasmussen say Denmark has if annexation is attempted?
Rasmussen said Denmark could terminate the agreement if the U.S. tries to annex all or part of Greenland. This shows Denmark’s red line on sovereignty over its Danish territories.
Why did Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen warn that a takeover could mean the end of NATO?
Frederiksen said a U.S. takeover would amount to the end of NATO. She believes it would pit allies against each other and break core principles of sovereignty and collective trust.
How are other European leaders responding to the takeover rhetoric?
Leaders of France, Germany, Italy, Poland, Spain, and the United Kingdom joined Frederiksen in a statement. They said the mineral-rich island “belongs to its people.” They support Greenlandic self-determination and reject pressure on Danish culture and governance in the Arctic region.
What did France’s foreign minister say after speaking with Rubio?
French Foreign Minister Jean-Noël Barrot said he spoke with Rubio, who dismissed the idea of a Venezuela-style operation in Greenland. Barrot told France Inter that U.S. public support for NATO could be damaged by aggressiveness toward another NATO member, and he said he would not engage in “fiction diplomacy” about hypothetical plans.
What was the reaction inside the U.S. Senate?
Senators Jeanne Shaheen and Thom Tillis, co-chairs of the bipartisan Senate NATO Observer Group, criticized the rhetoric. They said the U.S. must respect the sovereignty and territorial integrity of the Kingdom of Denmark and warned that coercion would undermine NATO’s principles of self-determination.
Why is this debate intensifying now in the Arctic region?
The debate is escalating because Trump links Greenland to American security at a time of rising Chinese and Russian activity in the Arctic. The added tension stems from the White House’s insistence that military force remains on the table, which unsettles Scandinavian countries and other NATO allies.
Where does the story stand right now?
Denmark and Greenland are pressing for a meeting with Rubio after earlier attempts failed. The push comes as Trump renews takeover talk, Rubio signals to lawmakers a preference for an eventual purchase, and allies across Northern Europe warn that coercive pressure could strain the transatlantic partnership.
